Central Precocious Puberty in a Toddler 

A 20-month-old boy is referred to a paediatric endocrine clinic for evaluation.  

Background: 

  • Born 35+4 weeks (maternal hypertension); neonatal intensive care unit for 24 days (respiratory support); no hypoglycaemia or seizures 
  • Neonatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): bilateral frontal polymicrogyria, hypoplastic corpus callosum, periventricular cystic change, enlarged infundibulum, possible ectopic posterior pituitary 
  • Developmental delay: not walking or talking at 20 months 
  • Height, weight and occipitofrontal circumference (OFC) all >99th centile since infancy – persistent rather than accelerating 
  • Genital exam normal: testes descended 

Q1. This toddler has been referred due to persistent overgrowth and macrocephalyWhat differential diagnoses may you consider?

Differential diagnosis 

  • Structural hypothalamic–pituitary abnormality (eg, hamartoma, Rathke cleft cyst, developmental anomaly) 
  • Congenital neurodevelopmental disorder or in-utero infection (e.g. congenital CMV infection) 
  • Congenital overgrowth syndrome (eg, Sotos, Weaver) 

Q2. What further investigations would you like to perform?

Investigation 

Frequency 

Auxology: height, weight, OFC 

Every review (6-monthly) 

Pituitary screen: cortisol, prolactin, thyroid function tests (TFTs), insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1, luteinising hormone/follicle-stimulating hormone (LH/FSH), testosterone 

Repeat annually if normal, or sooner if clinically indicated 

Chromosomal microarray and Fragile X testing 

Once, at baseline 

Neurology review with interval MRI 

As advised by neurology (eg, annually until diagnosis is established) 

Developmental assessment 

Ongoing 

 

Q3. Results of the investigations are shown below. Six months on from these, at age 2 years 9 months, height velocity had accelerated to 16.6 cm/yr putting height at +5.6 SDS. Looking back, is there anything in the previous investigations that might warrant further consideration? 

 

Test 

Result 

Comment 

Testosterone 

1.1 nmol/L 

Reference <0.8 nmol/L (prepubertal); mild elevation 

LH / FSH 

Not obtained 

Insufficient sample volume 

Prolactin 

315 mU/L 

Mildly elevated 

Cortisol 

620 nmol/L 

Adequate 

TFTs 

thyroid-stimulating hormone mildly elevated, free thyroxine normal 

 

  • The testosterone of 1.1 nmol/L at 26 months was detectable outside the recognised mini-puberty window, which in boys typically resolves by around 12 months of age 
  • A measurable testosterone beyond this window is not physiologically expected and should raise the question of evolving central precocious puberty (CPP). Unfortunately, in this case, the sample for gonadotropins was insufficient.

Q4With this in mind, what would you examine and how would this examination influence the working differential? 

With unexplained accelerating height velocity, androgen-driven growth must be considered, even in the context of an overgrowth clinical picture. An examination for both central and peripheral drivers of androgen excess is essential: 

  • Testicular volume and symmetry – bilateral, symmetrical enlargement usually points to gonadotropin-dependent (central) puberty; asymmetrical or unilateral enlargement raises suspicion of a primary testicular issue  
  • Genital staging – pubic hair, axillary hair, stretched penile length 
  • Skin – café-au-lait macules (McCune-Albright syndrome), hyperpigmentation (adrenal pathology) 
  • Abdominal examination – for adrenal or hepatic mass (hCG-secreting germ cell/hepatic tumours, androgen-secreting adrenal tumours) 
  • Blood pressure – hypertension can accompany some congenital adrenal hyperplasia variants (eg, 11β-hydroxylase deficiency)  


In this case, the findings of the examination revealed a testicular volume of 6 mL bilaterally, stretched penile length: ~5 cm, and Tanner staging of G2, P1, A1. Skin and abdominal examination were unremarkable. Blood pressure was normal.
 

The testicular volume of greater than or equal to 4 mL is indicative of precocious puberty.

Q5. What investigations confirmed the diagnosis, and what did they show? 

Investigation 

Result 

Interpretation 

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) stimulation test 

Baseline LH <1 U/L; 20 min LH 22.1 U/L; 60 min LH 18.6 U/L 

Pubertal (LH dominant) response* 

Bone age X-ray 

5 yrs 9 mths
At chronological age of
2 yrs 9 mths
 

Advanced ~3 years, consistent with sustained sex steroid exposure 

Tumour markers 

Alpha-foetoprotein normal; β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) negative 

No biochemical evidence of an hCG-secreting germ cell tumour 

Testicular ultrasound 

Right 2.7 mL, left 2.1 mL; no focal lesion 

Symmetrical, structurally normal testes – enlargement is gonadotrophin-driven, rather than a primary testicular issue. Nb, testicular volumes on ultrasound are commonly significantly lower than clinical measurements by orchidometer 

Adrenal androgens / inhibin B 

Normal / mildly raised 

No peripheral androgen source; inhibin B in keeping with early Sertoli cell activation 

Dedicated pituitary MRI 

Stable appearances. No hypothalamic–pituitary lesion 

Congenital abnormalities persist but there are no structural lesions driving precocious puberty  

Trio whole genome sequencing 

De novo heterozygous pathogenic variant in NSD1 gene  

Chromosomal microarray and Fragile X testing were negative, prompting trio whole genome sequencing. This confirmed an underlying diagnosis of Sotos syndrome. 

*A peak LH ≥5 U/L (assay-dependent) with LH exceeding FSH is generally accepted as diagnostic of gonadotrophin-dependent (central) puberty. Cut-offs vary by assay platform (modern immunochemiluminescent assays generally use lower thresholds than older radioimmunoassay methods) so local assay-specific reference ranges should be applied. This patient’s peak LH of 22.1 U/L is several-fold above threshold, with the typical early (20-minute) peak  

Based on these investigations, the diagnosis was confirmed to be idiopathic CPP, with an underlying diagnosis of Sotos syndrome, confirmed by whole-genome sequencing. Notably, obesity-associated or constitutional causes of rapid growth are not typically accompanied by macrocephaly; the persistence of OFC above the 99th centile since infancy in this child was suggestive of an underlying structural or syndromic cause.

Q6What are the management priorities? 

The current management priorities are control of CPP, in order to: 

  • Suppress the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis 
  • Halt progression of secondary sexual characteristics 
  • Slow bone maturation 
  • Preserve adult height potential.  


For CPP, GnRH analogues are the mainstay of treatment. 
 

GnRH analogues work by delivering continuous, rather than pulsatile, stimulation to the GnRH receptor. This paradoxically desensitises the pituitary, suppressing LH and FSH secretion and reducing sex steroid production. Several depot preparations exist internationally (eg, 1-, 3- and 6-monthly leuprolide acetate; a 12-monthly histrelin implant), though not all are licensed in the UK. Slow-release triptorelin pamoate remains the most widely used UK preparation. 

Treatment was commenced at 2 years 11 months with intramuscular slow-release triptorelin pamoate 11.25 mg every 12 weeks. By age 3.5 years: height velocity fell from 16.6 to ~6.5 cm/yr; bone age progression also slowed. 

Q7With the clinical picture stable, are there any modifications to treatment you might consider? 

  • 12-weekly triptorelin is effective, but carries a real burden: injection-site pain, inflammatory reactions, frequent hospital attendance, and disruption to nursery/school 
  • Extended-interval triptorelin embonate 22.5 mg given every 24 weeks is increasingly used in the UK 
  • A UK multicentre retrospective cohort study of 44 children with CPP found equivalent efficacy and tolerability between the 24- and 12-weekly regimens, with reduced treatment burden and potential cost savings 
  • Treatment was switched to the 24-weekly regimen in May 2024; suppression has been maintained since 

Conclusion 

  • CPP in boys under 3 years is rare and warrants full investigation to exclude intracranial pathology 
  • A detectable testosterone outside the mini-puberty window is not physiological and should prompt consideration of evolving CPP 
  • Height velocity acceleration can be the next clue – always examine testicular volume, even without pubic or axillary hair 
  • CPP is a recognised, but uncommon, manifestation of Sotos syndrome 
  • Extended-interval triptorelin embonate (22.5 mg, ~24-weekly) maintains suppression while roughly halving injection frequency – a meaningful benefit for very young children on long-term therapy. 
References

Meet the author

Dr Rachel Varughese

William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, UK

Rachel Varughese4
Sign up for eAlerts
Be the first to hear about new resources and content by signing up to receive our eAlerts.

We'd love your feedback!

Please complete this short 5-question survey to help improve the content offered on this website.
Please rank the following aspects of the program from best [1] to worst [4].